1)If I work so hard about what I do or if I am popular for What I do , I may be sad. But if I were Megan and in Megan's situation I definetly wouldnt care about it.

2) Of course she cares about it, everyone does care. Of course she would be sad. But I dont think she would be soo sad. Because I think  she knows her situation and her ability. I think that  she thinks she is talented but she doesnt do something for showing her talent.

I am not sure about her talent. I dont know is she talented or not. I just dont care about it right now.

nicolaspata said:

1) In the beginning I'd feel so sad and depressed about it, but then it will push me forward to work harder in order to shut people's mouth.

2) I believe she cares a lot because of many reasons:

-I'm pretty sure she doesn't want to be known more because of her looks or what she says than her work (acting). I believe this is the reason why she is pulling back lately.

-It's part of the human psychology to give more importance to negative comments than to positive ones. For example, 99 persons can tell you you are hot or whatever, but if just one persons tell you you are fucking ugly, it ruins your day.

-Negative comments are painful when you are working hard to improve.

I'd like her to know that many of us support her, that we don't think she is the worst actress and we believe in her.

Yes, she doesnt want to be known more because of her looks. That's true. But ı think she know who she is and why she is popular right now.  She'll be of course sad but ı dont think she'll be really really sad. She already said '' I have done nothing'', '' ''I am not gonna take an Oscar soon'' ''This movie is not about acting''. You know these quotes. She just does know who she is. But maybe this situation can change.

I also dont care about this Awards Show. A lot of beautiful and talented actresses were nominated. Charlize Theron has 1 Oscar, 1 Oscar nomination,  2 BAFTA nomination,  1 Emmy Award nomination, 2 Golden Globes nomination and many many others.  And she also has a nomination of a Razzies Award.

Angelina Jolie won Oscar and has 1 Oscar Nomination, 2 Golden Globes and 2 Golden Globes nominations, 2 SAG, 2 SAG nominations and many many others. But she also has Razzie nomination. When Charlize and Angie was known more because of their look (though they are so talented) , they had these Razzie nominations.

Angie has a Razzie nomination for Worst Actress in Lara Croft Tomb Raider. And now Megan is known more because of her looks, but this can change.

Another thing:

The people from the razzies seem bash everything about a movie they didn't like. It's obvious they didn't like ROTF at all:

-Worst Actress

-Worst on-screen team

-Worst supporting actress

-Worst director

-Another 3 more nominations I don't remember right now.

__ _

I think it's the same case about Tomb Raider. I watched the movie, and Jolie didn't do a bad job at all but the movie was bad. Why? Because it was a movie based on a videogame, but the director couldn't show the essense of the Tomb Raider franchise in a movie.

The nominations were dumb. The just nominated whoever it is popular to hate.

Like the Jonas Brothers for instance…they aren't even actors in that movie & I doubt they claim to be.

Same with Megan & Miley, I think they have just gone with who it is popular to hate. Like Twilight too.

Transformers wasn't a legit acting role, even Megan has said that. However with Jennifer's Body it was & I think in no way Megan should be nominated for that. She was perfect in that role.

I don't think Megan would particulary care, at least once she sees the other nominations she won't. Sandra Bullock is nominated & is also nominated for an Oscar lol!

The awards are boring.

nicolaspata said:

Another thing:

The people from the razzies seem bash everything about a movie they didn't like. It's obvious they didn't like ROTF at all:

-Worst Actress

-Worst on-screen team

-Worst supporting actress

-Worst director

-Another 3 more nominations I don't remember right now.

__ _

I think it's the same case about Tomb Raider. I watched the movie, and Jolie didn't do a bad job at all but the movie was bad. Why? Because it was a movie based on a videogame, but the director couldn't show the essense of the Tomb Raider franchise in a movie.

Yes, actually it's sometimes more about directors. For example, Clint Eastwood show his actors' talents and if you are even so bad at acting, he makes you look like a good actor. But Micheal Bay shows his actors hot and beautiful. But it's his technique, you cant say that technique is a bad thing.

Maybe Megan will work with directors who will show her real talent if she really has

Bingo!

That's Bay. And he is good a it. His talent are the special effects, the CGI, and his movies are about that. Explosions and more explosions, plus the hot girl of course: Megan in the Transformers franchise, Kate in Pearl Harbor, etc.

It doesn't matter who would have played Mikaela because the job of the actress would always be the same: Look hot running away from the robots.

I'd say you can't judge someone's acting skill from that franchise.

That's very possible, knowing that The Twilight saga was also nominated for the razzies.

Pattinson got the worst actor nomination, and as far as I've read his acting was good in the saga (I've not watched Twilight nor New Moon).