Home > Megan Fox > Megan Fox Maxim Hot 100 and Cosmo Germany

Megan Fox Maxim Hot 100 and Cosmo Germany

Megan Fox finished 8th on the 2012 Maxim Hot 100 list (link), not a bad showing! She also appears on the cover of the June 2012 issue of Cosmo Germany, here is a small picture of the cover for now. Radar Online is claiming Megan is pregnant and expecting a girl in September or October (link). Thanks to Deon for the tips!

  1. acgunner Alberto
    May 23rd, 2012 at 10:12 | #1

    she’s ALWAYS my number one!

  2. mmm
  3. mmm
  4. Courtney
    May 23rd, 2012 at 11:54 | #4

    Yeah I definitley do not believe she four months preg. Can you even find out the sex of the baby then? I thought it was 5 months considering the people I know find out then. I dont understand why these magazine articles blow this story WAY out of proportion. Did they not see her candids 2+ weeks ago? She definitley didnt even LOOK pregnant. If she is, I think she isnt due until Nov-Dec anyway. We still have to wait another month though probably before we see candids when they go to Hawaii. This is really getting annoying. I wish she would just say something, ESPECIALLY if its not true! Thats why I am really thinking she is preg.

  5. Courtney
    May 23rd, 2012 at 12:05 | #5

    Apparently megan has been spotted more times then we think. According to megan-fox.net theres these candid we didnt see:

    **edited^ we Saw those

    *Sorry for posting another megan site, it just wanted to bring to attention there is more candids.

    *If you go on the site to the paparazzi pics you will see shes been seen out 4-22, 4-20, 5-8, Theres just no pics yet which I dont understand.

    I didnt see any of these pics posted here so I figured I’d mention it

  6. escada
    May 23rd, 2012 at 14:22 | #6

    yeah.i did see the cosmo just earlier in the shop.. i was about to buy it just because of megan :)
    she looks so good..
    but my favorite look of her was during her jennifers body time tho.. with her dark brown hair..

    what is your favorite look of megan,guys? i am just curious:)

  7. Andie
    May 23rd, 2012 at 14:46 | #7

    @Courtney

    You can see the gender with more than 3 months. It’s not that impossible. But NO WAY she’s more than 4 months pregnant, IF she is. There’s no belly. Nothing. I agree with you. This is getting so annoying. I wish they (Brian and Megan) would actually tell if it’s true or false.

    If it’s false, Star and Enews will probably say she had a miscarriage. This is getting ridiculous.

  8. Courtney
    May 23rd, 2012 at 14:54 | #8

    @Andie

    O wow I didnt know that. 3 months? Interesting. But yes, ridiculous is right. They just need to set the record straight once and for all.

  9. mmm
  10. Alexander
    May 23rd, 2012 at 15:25 | #10

    I had a feeling the baby will be a girl but I did not want to ruin surprises by telling it…
    Congratulations for Megan. :-) I think a girl suits her better and her older son will be like a big brother so I think it is perfect. I bet that Brain is up in the clowds with joy.

  11. Andie
    May 23rd, 2012 at 15:28 | #11

    @Courtney

    Yep. One of my friends is 14 weeks is she’s already confirmed the gender (a boy). So it’s possible.

    About Megan, the thing is she doesn’t have any belly. And if more than 4 months, she should have one.

  12. Andie
  13. Courtney
    May 23rd, 2012 at 15:43 | #13

    @Andie

    HMM could it be??? Why is she doing that with her cardigan?? Suspicious suspicious!

  14. Andie
    May 23rd, 2012 at 15:45 | #14

    There’s no way her belly would grow that much in two weeks.

  15. Courtney
    May 23rd, 2012 at 15:46 | #15

    O my god Megan, you are really messing with us in these pics. What shes doing in these pics looks pretty obvious, shes pregnant.

  16. Courtney
    May 23rd, 2012 at 15:53 | #16

    I dont think her belly grew, I think the way she is covering up wearing that cardigan looks suspicious. Maybe she is covering up what might look more like a belly than we’ve seen before.

  17. Iwannaoldmeganback
    May 23rd, 2012 at 15:54 | #17

    The only bump on her is on her face – lips pumped up again!

  18. mandyfofoxy mandy fox
    May 23rd, 2012 at 16:15 | #18

    she is really pregnant, or Megan likes to joke with the fans lol

  19. foxfoxfox
    May 23rd, 2012 at 16:16 | #19

    She ha a blue bag under that cardigan there is no way of knowing.

  20. keith133
    May 23rd, 2012 at 16:27 | #20

    @Iwannaoldmeganback
    TROLL TROLL TROLL ALERT every time you make a comment im going to post this

  21. keith133
    May 23rd, 2012 at 16:28 | #21

    you cant really tell maybe there will be more pics from a different angle

  22. May 23rd, 2012 at 16:54 | #22

    omg she is really pregnant! *____*
    and i will definitely buy the cosmopolitan!!!! :))

  23. Eduardo Gomes
    May 23rd, 2012 at 17:45 | #24

    anyone seen Whore?
    I always wondered about this movie.

  24. je
    May 23rd, 2012 at 17:56 | #25

    due in sept? that means that she is in 4 months and half pregnant………

  25. je
    May 23rd, 2012 at 17:58 | #26

    radar online said that she is expecting A GIRL.

    OK…but where is the baby bump?? 2 weeks ago she had no baby bump.

  26. Deon Deon
    May 23rd, 2012 at 18:01 | #27

    Gossip Cop COnfirming it is very interesting they are usually reliable

    @Andie
    lol we need better pics, there is something under her top

    @Courtney
    we have all those pics

  27. newmeganfoxfan
    May 23rd, 2012 at 18:01 | #28

    @Deon
    same stuff as the previous articles.

    i think she really is pregnant and she is just playing with the media.

  28. Deon Deon
    May 23rd, 2012 at 18:02 | #29

    @newmeganfoxfan
    yea but Gossip Cop is saying someone confirmed it to them, Gossip Cop is reliable but in this case I think they are wrong

  29. Andie
    May 23rd, 2012 at 18:13 | #30

    Oh God, Gossip Cop RARELY spread false rumors. I’m getting more and more confused.

  30. Deon Deon
    May 23rd, 2012 at 18:32 | #31

    @Andie
    Maybe they spoke to someone who believed the rumours? Strange that they confirmed it right after a new rumour? while they wouldn’t confirm it for weeks?
    I saw people online saying Megan was Due in September before this new Star Magazine story I didn’t pay attention to it because it seemed to soon.

    they don’t name their source either.

  31. Andie
    May 23rd, 2012 at 18:42 | #32

    I think it’s so ridiculous that IF this pregnancy is false, both Megan and Brian keep adding fuel to the fire just to keep her in the spotlight.

    • Deon Deon
      May 23rd, 2012 at 19:01 | #33

      yea this is ridiculous, but the media is playing a part. They didn’t give Brian’s interview much attention and those that did just said he avoided the question which he didn’t. He was asked about the rumours and said they are just rumours, people mag never said they asked him if Megan was pregnant and he refused to answer.

      Even those ‘pics’ on Just Jared its ONE pic I wonder why they only have one? did the papz camera break or did the papz only make that 1 available to get more money for it the other pics probably show Megan with no bump

  32. iLoveMe
    May 23rd, 2012 at 19:09 | #34

    Because Entertainment Tonight wasn’t allowed to ask her any questions regarding her personal life, I’m assuming she’s pregnant and not willing to talk about it… yet anyway.

    If her gut is really as big as it appears in those just jared photos, she must be pulling a Beyonce and has a surrogate somewhere.

  33. Deon Deon
    May 23rd, 2012 at 19:12 | #35

    @iLoveMe
    They did ask her after Megan said it was ok and Megan denied it imo. Surrogate? please don’t talk nonsense

  34. B B
  35. hollywood
    May 23rd, 2012 at 19:36 | #37

    Radar online says its a girl due in sept/oct

  36. Andie
    May 23rd, 2012 at 19:43 | #38

    I’ve thought about “surrogate” too and I would be extremely disappointed if Megan and Brian try that.

    Unless one of them is having trouble now in this reproducing issue and need a surrogate to make a baby together, there’s no excuse to use a surrogate. Why even considerate it? So Megan don’t ruin her perfect abs with a pregnancy? It will be ridiculous and it will show Megan having her first big mistake as a mother: putting beauty and career in front of her own child. How can she want kids so badly like she says in interviews if she’s not even willing to carry them inside of her? Her words are all just for publicity and to show the world a image of “sweet wife and mother”?

    I really really really really hope they NEVER do that. If they do, it will be the biggest disappointment for me as a fan.

  37. Deon Deon
    May 23rd, 2012 at 19:43 | #39

    @B
    same pic as JJ

    @hollywood
    Yea that would make her 4 months pregnant at the Lakers game with no bump. Its possible but not likely

  38. Andie
    May 23rd, 2012 at 19:45 | #40

    *ops, consider

  39. Deon Deon
    May 23rd, 2012 at 19:48 | #41

    @Andie
    :D I agree, I don’t think Megan would do that.

    There is no proof that she is using a surrogate its nonsense to give that claim any credence

  40. Andie
    May 23rd, 2012 at 20:07 | #42

    @Deon

    I really hope you’re right. But it does make sense, especially since she has no belly but keeps provoking the media with these candids where she hides the belly, put cardigans over it, etc, etc.

  41. Deon Deon
    May 23rd, 2012 at 20:20 | #43

    @Andie
    like you said using a surrogate is a very serious thing, I would never say that about a mother unless I knew 100% she used one(had irrefutable proof)
    I don’t think pulling her cardigan means she is using a surrogate or is any kind of proof

  42. Andie
    May 23rd, 2012 at 20:31 | #44

    Neither do I, but it sure is her teasing the media.

    She knows people are dying to know if she’s really pregnant or not and she shows up, knowing she’s being photographed, pulling her cardigan, wearing her bag inside the cardigan????

    And like I said before, I would be really dissapointed if the surrogate is true. I only accept this if one of them is having problems in reproducing and this is the only way for them to have a baby together. Now using it for “beauty” purposes (like Beyonce) is going to be disappointing and ridiculous. It will totally change my opinion about them. Like you said THIS IS SERIOUS.

    • Deon Deon
      May 23rd, 2012 at 20:44 | #45

      teasing the papz yeap it could be seen as that but proof that she is using a surrogate nope.

  43. Andie
    May 23rd, 2012 at 20:47 | #46

    I really really hope she isn’t using a surrogate.

    • Deon Deon
      May 23rd, 2012 at 20:55 | #47

      I don’t think she is. I mean so much info is ‘leaking’ they would of told it to star magazine by now haha

  44. foxfoxfox
  45. Courtney
    May 23rd, 2012 at 21:39 | #49

    @Andie

    Beyonce didn’t use a surrogate, look at her pregnancy pics.

    @Deon
    I definitley didnt see the 4-19 candids posted here but okay.

  46. Deon Deon
    May 23rd, 2012 at 21:52 | #50

    @Courtney
    they were posted in the comments section Red didn’t add them to the main page for some reason

  47. Andie
    May 23rd, 2012 at 23:03 | #51

    @Courtney

    I’ve already looked but her belly was strange during that interview. It looked like a fake belly.

    Either way, I think using a surrogate just for beauty purposes is bad. If Beyonce or Megan didn’t use this, good for them.

  48. Iwannaoldmeganback
    May 24th, 2012 at 03:09 | #52

    @keith133
    And i don’t give a fack about you so if that makes you happy, I’m glade I could make your pathetic little life more sunnier.

  49. Deon Deon
    May 24th, 2012 at 03:13 | #53

    @Iwannaoldmeganback
    You come here and constantly post offensive comments expect to be called a troll

  50. Iwannaoldmeganback
    May 24th, 2012 at 04:13 | #54

    @Deon
    Pls don’t cry!

Comment pages
1 2 4658